what's my IQ
Aug. 14th, 2006 12:14![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
hahahahahhahahahahahaha! yeah, right. the "official IQ test" says so!

also, your bad image matte looks horrible on my background, people.
[edit: requires account creation in order to see results. stupid.]
there was one question i liked (addendum -- i liked it because it got me to thinking in contorted ways, while none of the other questions were any fun at all):
determine the missing number: "car, glove, clock, sock," "4, 5, 12, ? "
no subject
on 2006-08-14 20:34 (UTC)(The evil standardized tests are the ones written by people who know that people try to overcomplicate, and put those answers on the test.)
no subject
on 2006-08-14 20:46 (UTC)i would have had a harder time with the clock.
no subject
on 2006-08-14 20:49 (UTC)you're right. it becomes totally non-obvious then, and 5 is the least logical answer. i wonder whether it's even correct.
no subject
on 2006-08-16 20:00 (UTC)The average car contains 4 passengers.
The average glove contains 5 fingers.
The average clock contains 12 numbers.
The average sock contains 5 toes.
And the reason the sock question isn't "the average sock contains one foot" is because we're given the answer that they want the average glove to contain 5 fingers.
I actually had to train myself to think this way to get through school doing standardized tests. I had a tremendously painful period in my life where unfortunately I constantly responded "Not necessarily..." to almost every statement by anyone. Luckily I not only grew out of it relatively quickly, I learned to think of the alternatives and pick the one that was most likely the one normal people were looking for.
no subject
on 2006-08-16 22:10 (UTC)hahahahahaha! HOV lane designers everywhere have nightmares of this coming true.
no subject
on 2006-08-16 23:12 (UTC)I meant "is built to contain" but I've been thinking about that, and with the ridiculous numbers of SUVs on the road it may not be true.
no subject
on 2006-08-14 20:49 (UTC)(My brain considers "glove" and "sock" separately from "hand" and "foot" -- you might be able to see where I'm coming from if you think of it lying flat on a table, not *on* something.)
no subject
on 2006-08-14 21:00 (UTC)http://pleonastic.livejournal.com/191353.html?thread=854393#t854393
no subject
on 2006-08-14 21:02 (UTC)Besides what you've pointed out: A clock doesn't necessarily have 12 numbers. A digital clock has either 10 (0-9) or a Whole Bunch (12:00-11.59, and more if it counts seconds), depending on how you look at it. An analog clock might have 4 (12, 3, 6, 9) or none--I've seen both--and possibly some other combination.
Stupid question.