treatment of prisoners
Oct. 5th, 2005 23:36![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
the US senate just made me feel a little bit better about the US government: they agreed to regulate the detention, interrogation and treatment of prisoners held by the US military in an amendment to a military spending bill. the white house has threatened to veto the bill if the amendment were attached.
however, the senate showed some guts, a lot of republicans showed some common decency, and the measure passed 90 to 9, with 46 republicans joining 43 democrats and one independent in favor.
about time that they show this arrogant SOB in the white house that he can't get away with doing everything his damn unethical, corrupt way. man, i am hoping we'll see more and more of this. the honeymoon might finally be over.
however, the senate showed some guts, a lot of republicans showed some common decency, and the measure passed 90 to 9, with 46 republicans joining 43 democrats and one independent in favor.
about time that they show this arrogant SOB in the white house that he can't get away with doing everything his damn unethical, corrupt way. man, i am hoping we'll see more and more of this. the honeymoon might finally be over.
no subject
on 2005-10-06 06:58 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-10-06 11:38 (UTC)Every week, this man says something that makes me want to buy him a drink. The true test would be in the House. Much more neoconservative, but everyone has to stand election every two years so maybe they could be convinced to apply some sensible guidance to an unpopular war effort.
no subject
on 2005-10-06 14:08 (UTC)Yup. I would soooo much rather he'd been the GOP candidate instead of BII.
no subject
on 2005-10-06 15:10 (UTC)I guess being a popular senator with a safe seat and a free lifetime pass to the pulpit is good enough for thoughtful people like McCain or *sniff* Daniel Patrick Moynihan.
no subject
on 2005-10-06 21:59 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-10-06 14:29 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-10-06 17:50 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-10-06 18:26 (UTC)