stephen greenleaf --
book case
a john marshall tanner mystery (he's a san francisco private detective). a manuscript has been left with the publisher of a small press, which said publisher thinks will be a bestseller, destined to save his bankrupt business. unfortunately, nobody knows who the author is. JMT gets hired on to find out, and quickly comes to thinking that the manuscript is a roman à clef, that the events described really happened at a prestigious SF school, and that the author was wrongly accused. so quickly that he sorta lost me there, but hey.
it was a decent read, with the requisite twistiness to absorb me for a night. JMT is a wee bit much of a self-congratulatory smug liberal, but i'd probably rather hang out with him than with the literati at the small press publication party with which the book opens -- never having been to one, greenleaf describes it in a manner that makes me never want to go to one either. :)
lisa appignanesi --
paris requiemparis, 1899, la belle époque, is the setting for this novel that juggles murder, racial prejudice, dysfunctional families, medical research. james norton, a boston lawyer comes to paris to convince his ex-pat reporter brother rafael and ailing sister ellie to return home to their mother. the day he arrives his brother's fiancée olympe, a jewish actress, is found drowned. was it murder or suicide? rafael seems obsessed with finding out. ellie behaves cryptically. instead of packing up the siblings and returning home, james gets sucked into the maelstrom of paris's seedy underbelly.
sounds promising, no? the milieu is brought to life well, including the entire style of the book. alas, it didn't hold together well for me. i never cared about any of the main characters; worse, i took a dislike to them. i actively disliked ellie pretty much from the start, a passive-aggressive woman who trades on her illness, rafael remains flat and shallow, hurrying about without communicating what's going on in his mind, and james is a mostly ineffectual goody-two-shoe whom chief inspector durand should have tossed in jail when it became first obvious that he was interfering with the investigation. we don't really find out enough about olympe for me to care, though what we do find out made me want to know more. frustrating. the only character i found really interesting is marguerite de landois, a wealthy comtesse who befriended olympe, and who takes james under her wing.
the great depiction of the milieu might makes this worth reading despite its flaws (and of course not everyone will dislike the characters as i did). i came out of it adding a couple of non-fiction books on the period, and specifically on
the dreyfus affair to my reading list.