to the stupid missile defence, says canada's government. good job, mr. martin. i'm coming to like you more lately. i appreciate the tough position any canadian prime minister with halfway decent ethics finds zirself in when trying to deal with the bush regime; stalling as long as possible was probably the best thing to do. though -- maybe a hint to your US ambassador next time? might be a good idea.
of course cellucci (whom i dislike with a bit of passion) immediately spewed about how that means canada has given up its sovereignty, and threatened that washington would do what it felt it needed to do, disregarding canadian airspace. twits. piss off.
of course cellucci (whom i dislike with a bit of passion) immediately spewed about how that means canada has given up its sovereignty, and threatened that washington would do what it felt it needed to do, disregarding canadian airspace. twits. piss off.
no subject
on 2005-02-25 06:38 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-02-25 12:13 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-02-25 14:07 (UTC)In Bushspeak "sovereignty" means doing as the U.S. government tells you. Hence, Iraq and Afghanistan are "sovereign" states. He wants Syria and Iran to be "sovereign" too.
no subject
on 2005-02-25 18:56 (UTC)1) When the rogue states decide to nuke us, it will not be a missle attack. It's like we're still fighting the Soviets in their minds.
2) Being in the room with you hardly means that their beliefs will be heard or followed. Gee, I wonder why the US gave up its sovereignty when they walked out of Kyoto or the International Court?
3) Canada already has a missle shield, which guarantees that no incoming missle will ever be headed toward Canada. It is the hundreds of millions of assholes who live in the nation to the south of her. Anyone who developed mobile WMDs and then wasted them on Canadians would be thrown out of the Axis of Evil potluck dinners.