the internist
Feb. 12th, 2008 14:06on friday i finally had my appointment with the internist, dr w. this is the same internist the hospital was going to refer me to, but apparently that idea got lost between the ER doc and whoever else was involved in that game of telephone. then my GP was gonna make an appointment with another internist, and i don't know what happened there, but it never came about. finally, he said he'd call this one, and *whew*, this time it happened.
boy, am i glad, too. this is my kind of doctor. he's eager to find out what is wrong, he's curious, he does research (and as my luck has it, research on atrial fibrillation), he's gung-ho. he asked all the questions i thought from reading he should be asking (but which other doctors had only asked a subset of), and then some. he called the hospital to request my ECGs pronto (the ones taken while i was actually in afib). he took one right there. he was excited about my record keeping (i take my blood pressure twice and my blood glucose once a day and graph the data), he wanted to keep the graphs i brought. he was critical of some prior treatment where i had had questions (without me prompting it). he said i made the right decisions about low carbs, salt, and aspirin, and added anti-inflammatories and anti-histamines to the list of things i should stay away from. i did forget to ask how careful i have to be about caffeine; i'll ask that next time.
so now we're cooking -- i have more lab tests to do, and on thursday i do a stress test, and get a holter monitor and possibly another spiffy new machine he has, to measure stuff about my heart for a week. i am lucky, i found a fellow research geek. he might be able to use me for one of his studies; i'm fine with that.
i like him. he said "weight loss" but also said "i know, easier said than done, i am the posterchild for that" (he's chubby), so there was no particular stupid pressure, and i think i can get him away from that phrasing. i really like how engaged he was, and that he's not laid back about finding a cause -- even if we might not find one, he's not assuming that from the start, he wants to know.
generally healthwise i am ... mixed. my blood glucose levels were perfectly normal for several weeks, but this last week have been slightly above 6.1 and i am not sure why. my blood pressure is also not as low in the mornings as it was in the period before my last tach attack. but i have more energy, and i am doing more things. it all feels quietly precarious though, and any new attack will knock me over again. i am not sleeping in my room (because that's where i get these attacks -- i know this is pure superstition, but i feel better sleeping on the couch and just don't want to bother fighting it right now). the celexa still makes me mildly nauseated, so now i am taking it just before i go to sleep. no change in dosages, except for aspirin (halved it): metoprolol 50mg x 2, micardis HCT 80mg, celexa 20mg, aspirin 81mg.
boy, am i glad, too. this is my kind of doctor. he's eager to find out what is wrong, he's curious, he does research (and as my luck has it, research on atrial fibrillation), he's gung-ho. he asked all the questions i thought from reading he should be asking (but which other doctors had only asked a subset of), and then some. he called the hospital to request my ECGs pronto (the ones taken while i was actually in afib). he took one right there. he was excited about my record keeping (i take my blood pressure twice and my blood glucose once a day and graph the data), he wanted to keep the graphs i brought. he was critical of some prior treatment where i had had questions (without me prompting it). he said i made the right decisions about low carbs, salt, and aspirin, and added anti-inflammatories and anti-histamines to the list of things i should stay away from. i did forget to ask how careful i have to be about caffeine; i'll ask that next time.
so now we're cooking -- i have more lab tests to do, and on thursday i do a stress test, and get a holter monitor and possibly another spiffy new machine he has, to measure stuff about my heart for a week. i am lucky, i found a fellow research geek. he might be able to use me for one of his studies; i'm fine with that.
i like him. he said "weight loss" but also said "i know, easier said than done, i am the posterchild for that" (he's chubby), so there was no particular stupid pressure, and i think i can get him away from that phrasing. i really like how engaged he was, and that he's not laid back about finding a cause -- even if we might not find one, he's not assuming that from the start, he wants to know.
generally healthwise i am ... mixed. my blood glucose levels were perfectly normal for several weeks, but this last week have been slightly above 6.1 and i am not sure why. my blood pressure is also not as low in the mornings as it was in the period before my last tach attack. but i have more energy, and i am doing more things. it all feels quietly precarious though, and any new attack will knock me over again. i am not sleeping in my room (because that's where i get these attacks -- i know this is pure superstition, but i feel better sleeping on the couch and just don't want to bother fighting it right now). the celexa still makes me mildly nauseated, so now i am taking it just before i go to sleep. no change in dosages, except for aspirin (halved it): metoprolol 50mg x 2, micardis HCT 80mg, celexa 20mg, aspirin 81mg.
no subject
on 2008-02-12 23:21 (UTC)And, besides which, just because the only problems it might result in might only be psychosomatic, that doesn't make them not-real or not-problems. Bodies are liable to do strange things when their minds expect them to go wrong.
I'm glad to hear you've found someone good to work with!
no subject
on 2008-02-13 03:00 (UTC)after getting the holter monitor, i will sleep in my room. :)
no subject
on 2008-02-14 06:16 (UTC)I didn't mean that this itself was psychosomatic, but that any additional effects that you might have from sleeping in the bedroom would be. (And I also meant that in the broader meaning of physical symptoms resulting from mind stimuli, not just the narrower meaning where the symptoms are also mental.)
no subject
on 2008-02-12 23:40 (UTC)no subject
on 2008-02-12 23:48 (UTC)He sounds very promising...I hope he'll keep up to your expectations!
He reminds me a little of Dr. House, you know the part where he's eager to find the cause for your symptoms...minus the snarkiness ofcourse...
Be well, my friend...
and do ask about the caffeine I'm curious!
no subject
on 2008-02-13 00:27 (UTC)no subject
on 2008-02-13 01:51 (UTC)NSAIDS, salt
on 2008-02-13 02:55 (UTC)NSAIDs provoke salt-water retention which is partly responsible for edema, and implied in an increase in blood pressure and decompensation of heart failure. this seems well-known though nobody said it to me before; when i looked it up i found lots of references.
i had edema quite some time before the first afib attack; i hadn't even realized how bad it was because it had been coming on gradually. the diuretic and diet changes seem to have taken care of it; my feet are back to normal, and i don't feel like my lungs are congested anymore either.
Re: NSAIDS, salt
on 2008-02-14 05:19 (UTC)I am glad this doctor suited your needs so well!
Re superstition: I'd say go with it for now. I wonder if the air quality could be worse in your bedroom, and lower oxygen could be affecting you? (sheer speculation)
no subject
on 2008-02-13 09:19 (UTC)You have seen this?:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/07/health/07diabetes.html
(you probably have and I don't know enough about your background to know what I'm talking about)
no subject
on 2008-02-13 15:50 (UTC)Yay!!!
And psychosomatic head games just have to play themselves out, IMO. If you do what you think is going to be healthy for yourself, or relieve stress, or just psyche yourself out, it's a good thing.
I think James Hillman is useful reading for dealing with mind-body issues. Have you tried him ever?
no subject
on 2008-02-13 16:11 (UTC)Doctors
on 2008-02-13 18:29 (UTC)no subject
on 2008-02-13 23:05 (UTC)