remember, privacy isn't
Aug. 7th, 2006 09:40![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
piranhaAOL releases 20 million search entries from 650,000 users, with associated information, and poorly anonymized. what were they thinking? did they not pay attention when the USDOJ got raked over the coals for asking search engine companies for this data (ostensibly to protect The Childruuun)? no, they must have known, since they handed over their data then, all compliant-like (bastards!). did they miss that google actually fought this tooth and nail? or did they somehow think that provided an opportunity for them? i boggle at the stupidity of this move.
they took the page and the dataset down after the news hit the blogosphere and was clearly not received with delight, but not fast enough -- i got a copy. which means thousands of other people also got one. and since the data is now out there it will spread. while i won't do anything with this, the net is rife with opportunists. the data includes personal names, addresses, social security numbers. hello, identity theft! this will probably also affect google, since AOL just repackaged google's engine, and this data will provide a gold mine for spammers whose method of choice is google's adsense.
these news come on the same day as this (which is how i came across it): AOL lays off 5000 people. it has lost 9 million paying subscribers in the past four years - almost one in three from its peak.
if i were on AOL i'd be cancelling my account today. in a poll taken after the above-mentioned USDOJ scandal, 56% of people didn't appreciate their private data being given to the government. guess how many will appreciate having it given to criminals?
i imagine those won't remain the only layoffs. and you know? i am not gonna weep if AOL hits the big bitbucket in the sky. that company made the internet a bit crappier by offering bad value via an interface designed for "dummies" (in the yellow book sense, not the "stupid people" sense). it's always september on the net now in large part due to AOL. seems they've caught their own stupidity virus.
2006-08-08 addendum:
well, that didn't take long. somebody has put the dataset into an SQL database and put up a query interface -- so if you're concerned that you might have sensitive private data out there, you can check for yourself rather easily now.
they took the page and the dataset down after the news hit the blogosphere and was clearly not received with delight, but not fast enough -- i got a copy. which means thousands of other people also got one. and since the data is now out there it will spread. while i won't do anything with this, the net is rife with opportunists. the data includes personal names, addresses, social security numbers. hello, identity theft! this will probably also affect google, since AOL just repackaged google's engine, and this data will provide a gold mine for spammers whose method of choice is google's adsense.
these news come on the same day as this (which is how i came across it): AOL lays off 5000 people. it has lost 9 million paying subscribers in the past four years - almost one in three from its peak.
if i were on AOL i'd be cancelling my account today. in a poll taken after the above-mentioned USDOJ scandal, 56% of people didn't appreciate their private data being given to the government. guess how many will appreciate having it given to criminals?
i imagine those won't remain the only layoffs. and you know? i am not gonna weep if AOL hits the big bitbucket in the sky. that company made the internet a bit crappier by offering bad value via an interface designed for "dummies" (in the yellow book sense, not the "stupid people" sense). it's always september on the net now in large part due to AOL. seems they've caught their own stupidity virus.
2006-08-08 addendum:
well, that didn't take long. somebody has put the dataset into an SQL database and put up a query interface -- so if you're concerned that you might have sensitive private data out there, you can check for yourself rather easily now.
no subject
on 2006-08-08 01:55 (UTC)Privately, of course. ;)
no subject
on 2006-08-08 04:40 (UTC)if anyone wants the dataset to look for themselves, i can suss out current repositories that have it (the original link i used is gone). it's 439MB compressed, so not a quickie download for dialup users.
at first i was gonna offer to look for such private info if somebody wants to give it to me, but that feels a) too ironic, and b) i don't really want to have it, you know?
no subject
on 2006-08-08 20:57 (UTC)well, this didn't take long; somebody has put up a query interface to the dataset in SQL form: http://www.aolsearchdatabase.com/ -- you can tell everyone you know who might be affected that this is the quickest way to find out.
search proxies
on 2006-08-10 05:44 (UTC)If you could separate your identity from your search terms and confound ad tracking wouldnt YOU?
http://www.blackboxsearch.com
Re: search proxies
on 2006-08-10 07:06 (UTC)please sign a name, handle, link to your blog/website; something to indicate who you are.