boozelicious poisoning
Jul. 24th, 2005 18:59warning: high rant content.
i didn't have organic chemistry in highschool, and i've never been much interested in potable alcohol from the typical end user's point of view -- i don't like its effects when drunk, neither on myself nor on many other people -- so my recent investigations into perfumery have given me some surprises.
see, i've been trying to find a high-percentage, pure-as-possible (90-95%) ethyl alcohol, in order to experiment with making alcohol-based perfumes -- essential oils dissolve nicely in it, and it's a super preservative. it's what professional perfumers use. i just want a small bottle, like half a litre. do you think that's possible to buy anywhere in this town of 80,000 people? apparently not. drugstores feature isopropyl and rubbing alcohol, and they have a strong smell, totally unsuitable. hardware stores carry methanol and a variety of denatured ethanols, all of which are not stuff i want to have sit on my skin. liquor stores offer at best vodka, which is only 40%, and carries a hefty price tag. i could get it, though i haven't found a canadian online source yet, from a chemical supply house -- but i don't want to buy a 55 gallon drum, for heaven's sakes. getting it from the US is bound to cause all sorts of cross-border trouble, and it's not like the US is any more sensible about alcohol than canada. anything i can get locally is poisonous crap. WTF? we're not talking about weapons-grade plutonium here.
so i do a little more research. and if i understand this correctly, ethanol (ethyl alcohol, grain alcohol) is the "good" alcohol, the safest, least toxic of the lot, the stuff people drink, and what should be used in perfumes. methanol (methyl alcohol, methyl hydrate, wood alcohol), on the other hand, is a "bad" alcohol, it's highly toxic, metabolises into formaldehyde and formic acid, and can have severe degenerative effects on the retina and the central nervous system if drunk; the fumes alone aren't the cat's meow. isopropanol is somewhere in between, not quite as toxic as methanol, but more so than ethanol.
y'all probably knew this already, but i can be naive about things that never popped up on my radar: methanol appears to be a very typical thing industry puts into perfectly good ethanol to create "denatured alcohol" (which means "made unsuitable to drink"), to not have to pay the heavy taxes governments put on drinking alcohol.
i am probably really, really late with my upset, but this is outrageous. i can't get a small amount of clean alcohol to make perfume, instead i have a choice between stuff that's toxified or too thin, because my government thinks anyone who drinks booze ought to pay through the nose for it, and besides, we're apparently not adult enough to handle >40%. i wonder how many people end up in hospital each year drinking those toxified alcohols, and what that costs me, the tax payer, in turn; nevermind the human cost.
you know, that still i was talking about? now i am considering making my own alcohol. wanna bet it's illegal, even for personal use? those fuckers.
i'm clearly bucking the trend: the older i get, the more anarchist i turn, and the less respect i have for the overwheening nannydom of governments.
i didn't have organic chemistry in highschool, and i've never been much interested in potable alcohol from the typical end user's point of view -- i don't like its effects when drunk, neither on myself nor on many other people -- so my recent investigations into perfumery have given me some surprises.
see, i've been trying to find a high-percentage, pure-as-possible (90-95%) ethyl alcohol, in order to experiment with making alcohol-based perfumes -- essential oils dissolve nicely in it, and it's a super preservative. it's what professional perfumers use. i just want a small bottle, like half a litre. do you think that's possible to buy anywhere in this town of 80,000 people? apparently not. drugstores feature isopropyl and rubbing alcohol, and they have a strong smell, totally unsuitable. hardware stores carry methanol and a variety of denatured ethanols, all of which are not stuff i want to have sit on my skin. liquor stores offer at best vodka, which is only 40%, and carries a hefty price tag. i could get it, though i haven't found a canadian online source yet, from a chemical supply house -- but i don't want to buy a 55 gallon drum, for heaven's sakes. getting it from the US is bound to cause all sorts of cross-border trouble, and it's not like the US is any more sensible about alcohol than canada. anything i can get locally is poisonous crap. WTF? we're not talking about weapons-grade plutonium here.
so i do a little more research. and if i understand this correctly, ethanol (ethyl alcohol, grain alcohol) is the "good" alcohol, the safest, least toxic of the lot, the stuff people drink, and what should be used in perfumes. methanol (methyl alcohol, methyl hydrate, wood alcohol), on the other hand, is a "bad" alcohol, it's highly toxic, metabolises into formaldehyde and formic acid, and can have severe degenerative effects on the retina and the central nervous system if drunk; the fumes alone aren't the cat's meow. isopropanol is somewhere in between, not quite as toxic as methanol, but more so than ethanol.
y'all probably knew this already, but i can be naive about things that never popped up on my radar: methanol appears to be a very typical thing industry puts into perfectly good ethanol to create "denatured alcohol" (which means "made unsuitable to drink"), to not have to pay the heavy taxes governments put on drinking alcohol.
i am probably really, really late with my upset, but this is outrageous. i can't get a small amount of clean alcohol to make perfume, instead i have a choice between stuff that's toxified or too thin, because my government thinks anyone who drinks booze ought to pay through the nose for it, and besides, we're apparently not adult enough to handle >40%. i wonder how many people end up in hospital each year drinking those toxified alcohols, and what that costs me, the tax payer, in turn; nevermind the human cost.
you know, that still i was talking about? now i am considering making my own alcohol. wanna bet it's illegal, even for personal use? those fuckers.
i'm clearly bucking the trend: the older i get, the more anarchist i turn, and the less respect i have for the overwheening nannydom of governments.
p.s. yes, i know i can use oils carriers rather than alcohol. but that's a different thing altogether.
no subject
on 2005-07-25 03:52 (UTC)(dunno if you've seen that link or not)
I work for fedex here, so if you want to order something that will only ship to a US address I can re-ship it for you if you want...
Let me know it's coming, the address is:
Mellissa Pottle
2049 Franklin Way
Marietta, GA 30067
678-887-9641
(work address)
no subject
on 2005-07-25 04:26 (UTC)btw, this isn't flocked; i don't know whether you're comfortable having your work address out in public; feel free to delete if that was an oversight.
no subject
on 2005-07-25 04:42 (UTC)As far as the work address, it's not a big deal. It's not like I actually work there. :)
no subject
on 2005-07-25 04:42 (UTC)One of the reasons it's controlled is because the risk of alcohol poisoning is extremely high if anybody did decide to try their luck.
no subject
on 2005-07-25 04:58 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-25 05:01 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-25 05:09 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-25 11:01 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-25 18:14 (UTC)chem class
on 2005-07-25 18:19 (UTC)i've been thinking of taking a couple chem class myself, actually. i really regret not having had more chemistry in highschool, and wouldn't mind acquiring a lot more knowledge in that area.
anhydrous alcohol
on 2005-07-25 18:29 (UTC)it's a interesting question whether i count my risks as cost. i think that building a one-time still for an experiment with alcohol that i'm neither gonna drink nor sell nor give away to other people, carries extremely little risk, especially when compared to the fun of experimenting (and a smidgen, i admit, of thumbing my nose at the government). i figure the cops here are too busy finding grow-ops to bust while dope is still illegal. of course, making public entries about it in my LJ is pretty idiotic if i wanted to minimise the risk. so maybe i shouldn't document the actual building, eh. :) that is, if i ever get around to it.
no subject
on 2005-07-25 18:32 (UTC)Sheesh, apparently you can't even ship denatured alcohol out of the US now. Doesn't seem to be a Canadian distributor for any of the stuff to personal users like yourself. I say again, sheesh.
If you had your heart set on doing something illegal, a still is time-consuming and expensive and apparently difficult to get 190 proof anyway. Seems like less work to come down here and smuggle back some Everclear 190 in a gas can. Just to make things fun for you, "here" doesn't include Washington State, Oregon, or California because those are three of the four states that have completely outlawed grain. It's starting to sound like a remake of "Smokey and the Bandit".
no subject
on 2005-07-26 06:49 (UTC)no subject
on 2005-07-27 05:12 (UTC)smuggling
on 2005-07-27 07:02 (UTC)so far i found one online canadian distributor for denatured 190 proof ethanol in small amounts, but i'd have to be a certified teacher or home schooling parent for them to send me some. and then it's still poisonous, of course.
nope, not into smuggling at all; that's the sort of adventure i'd engage in for people in danger of their lives, not for a little experiment. besides which i don't even cross the US border these days with all my legal ducks in a row. if i were to do anything illegal, i'd feel much safer doing it in my own backyard. i also don't think building a small still needs to be expensive, and getting the juice to 190 proof can apparently easily be done with a fractionating column. adding the cost of a return trip to idaho plus the cost of the stress from smuggling and crossing the border under this bloody regime would end up feeling much more expensive than i expect a still would, even if i were to order it from NZ. :) and that would also be a lot less fun than building it myself!
there's actually heaps of info available online, especially from NZ where home distillation is legal. earlier today i've also come across some sites that talk about making ethanol as biofuel, though there we're definitely talking 55 gallon drum setup, *snicker*. mmmh, sawdust, sulphuric acid and yeast! sounds delish. i think i'll pay more attention to http://www.home-distiller.com/ instead.
no subject
on 2005-07-27 07:25 (UTC)no subject
on 2007-11-24 00:23 (UTC)